Sister Anita the Cross-Dressing Clown???

By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics and access other forums reserved for members. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today by clicking here.

Posted: Wed Oct 20, 2010 7:09 pm

Ok everyone here is my newest and oddest clown. The lad has been contacting my church character as Sister Anita. She was taking a long time to send the pictures so I assumed she was a he as they usually are and was looking for a way to get a female to do the pictures. Then today my inbox was blessed with these gems. Is this a he or a she???? It looks like a case of lad cross-dressing but I would love to see everyone’s opinions. The only one that looks feminine to me is the picture of her holding the sign…

Posted: Wed Oct 20, 2010 7:16 pm

if that's a ladette, those are some darn big muscle arms. wouldn't want to make her mad Laughing

has to be a cross dressing lad. perhaps bikini pics? Shocked

419Eater is my life Joined: 29 Sep 2010 Posts: 407

I think it's 2 different people... 1st and 3rd look similar...same with 2nd and 4th. But I could be wrong.... And what?!?! no goats this time? Crying or Very sad

Posted: Wed Oct 20, 2010 7:37 pm

^^yeah I thought that too but the nose us identical in all four.

Sorry I will try and get the goats in on the re-do it missed a critical step.

Posted: Wed Oct 20, 2010 9:51 pm

Brother and sister, maybe? They look remarkably similar.

I think #2 is definitely a guy--hence the wrap on his head.

Posted: Wed Oct 20, 2010 9:56 pm

^^I agree # 2 is the most manly pic. In 1 and 3 you can make out a mustache though but my grandma had one too so not concrete proof.

Posted: Wed Oct 20, 2010 10:42 pm

#3 is wearing the world's smallest falsies. Razz

Great job again, bravo! I'm lovin' the clown pics.

Baiting Guru Joined: 29 Jan 2008 Posts: 2531 Location: AU

oh she is a hottie

Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 1:09 am

Now I'm starting to think it is two different people. I cant figure out why he or she would do that though... I might be convinced that 1,3 and 4 is a women but the time spent working in San Francisco tells me #2 is a MAN!

Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 4:20 am

bravo, if that's a chick, I will eat my hat.

My vote? Definitely lad. I think all the pics are the same lad (same nose, same eyelids). #1 is wearing a wig for certain.

Great pics! Laughing

Baiting Guru Joined: 29 Jan 2008 Posts: 2531 Location: AU

i second that. but i wont eat my hat

419Eater is my life Joined: 29 Sep 2010 Posts: 407

bravo95 wrote:

Now I'm starting to think it is two different people. I cant figure out why he or she would do that though... I might be convinced that 1,3 and 4 is a women but the time spent working in San Francisco tells me #2 is a MAN!

There's something not quite right about photo 3. I think its a bad photochop job. Maybe thats why they all look similar but a bit off?
Poorly done clone stamp...You see on the right of its head, the colours are the same as to the left. Plus the shoulder area is off.

Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 12:31 pm

Way to go, bravo95!

clapping

Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 12:56 pm

extremeb, I disagree. Looks like he/she is standing in front of a reflective surface. The person in the stripey shirt is taking the photo and the stripes on the right are a reflection of his shirt on the pole.

Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 1:12 pm

^^you are correct! Good catch.

Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 1:15 pm

Great pics btw (forgot to mention that earlier Embarassed

)

Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 1:20 pm

That isn't a pole. Its a window frame (two panel window) but I agree, he/she/it is standing in front of a window with reflective tinting and the person taking the picture is wearing a brightly colored striped shirt and bracelets.

Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 1:39 pm

^^ Ah yes, I see it now. Awkward to get the perspective Confused

Not quite a Newb Joined: 05 Mar 2010 Posts: 26

Jebus Christ... the second picture is borderline offensive...

but this is ladwork, so I guess we can let it slide. Laughing

Posted: Fri Oct 22, 2010 8:35 pm

I'm in the process of getting new pictures sent. I'm hoping with more evidence we can solve this mystery.

419Eater is my life Joined: 29 Sep 2010 Posts: 407

^^^ don't forget...goats!

Posted: Sat Oct 23, 2010 2:56 pm

Well all the gig is up. I have no idea how but the he-she figured me out. We will not be getting updated pictures so I guess the mystery will never be solved..

Unless.. A little plan I have brewing works. I will update if it does.

Posted: Sat Oct 23, 2010 3:13 pm

Oh noes! Sorry to hear that bravo. Sad

It would be interesting to know how the he/she twigged. I hope whatever plan you are brewing works. Very Happy

Hello I'm New here! Joined: 21 Oct 2010 Posts: 4

You should note the hair styles in the first and last pics. The first pic has straight hair and the last pic has tightly wound dreadlocks/twists (whichever you prefer to classify those as). Going from straight hair to dreads is a long process. Going from dreads to straight is also a long, drawn out process.

Based on the difficulty in changing hair style, I would have to suggest that there are either wigs going on, or these are different people.

Posted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 9:38 pm

#4 is the first lad photo I've EVER seen that doesn't require the hands to be chopped. If that's a ladette then I'm fossilised porcupine poopoo.

Can't wait for the mankini shots.

Sister Anita the Cross-Dressing Clown???	View next topic View previous topic