Pass the Parcel - Scambait style

By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics and access other forums reserved for members. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today by clicking here.

Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 6:07 am

Red wrote:

but there will be NO cash baiting as long as I am involved,

@ Red - You are such a goody two shoes... mods pet, mods pet... Laughing

but I agree, I have no intention of cash baiting and don't want to see it happening from the LM account...

I would like to see him spend the money on WU fees... they cost a fortune... I think this is the same lad who is making the calls to , so he obviously has something he needs to get off his chest...

BTW, whoever sent the list of 10 people they trust... brilliant... especially Mr and Mrs Doe...

I wish I had an imagination... MTV generation and all that...

Cheers,
fun2scam

Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 6:08 am

As I stated earlier, check the email account for an update.

Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 7:14 am

Red wrote:

^^^ I sent the email about , I don't know who sent the others.

Whoops, went to by accident! he should have told me sooner that it was union, ah well, back to it! Laughing

I'll admit to being so stupid that I mixed Union and Express. What a silly boy! I was trying so hard to be helpful. Rolling Eyes

Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 7:21 am

^^^ yes, this should have him rather annoyed!

Forms by Eamonn · Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 10:38 am

I have not been following this thread but I have one suggestion;

form a team just like a corporation;

you can have at least

1. The manager
2. The accountant
3. The secretary
4. The messenger
5. The logistics dept
6. The pantry lady

other corporations involve;

1. A bank or WU or MG (someone who handles the money transfer)
2. A courier company
3. A freight forwarder
4. A lawyer
5. An auditor
6. Customer service
7. and God knows what else

with a team of 13 co-ordinators, one lad has to face 13 baiters, irrespective of the number of lads, they will still face the same of baiters;

and preferably the first seven share part of a common name in the email;

eg [email protected]
eg [email protected]

just my two cents

Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 12:27 pm

Scammer said

Quote:

I have not been following this thread but I have one suggestion;

Following this thread is very confusing. Taking part in the bait, even more so. Laughing

I see your point though. Set up hiarchy of baiters with emails from the same source and then pass the lad up and down the line to deal with different members of the "corporation". It would be taking this type of bait a step further. More organised so to speak.

Forms by Eamonn · Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:35 pm

getting a group of baiters to deal with a lad is not productive;

getting a group of baiters to deal with many lads is; (multiplier effect)

eg

the manager wants the lad to contact the accounts for details for payment; simply cc the message to the accounts and maybe cc to the pantry lady (since she keeps the petty cash)
[advisable to bcc to the rest of the team; afterall the roles are exchangeable]

also known as passing the buck in the real world;
the result; the lad will go round and round

afterall, this is a joint effort to reduce the number of victims

Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:56 pm

^^^ Hmmmm an interesting idea Scammer.

If you read through the thread, and the baits, you'll notice that there is not 10 baiters working 1 lad.

It's more like 10 baiters working 15 lads.

Your idea is basically turning their tactics back on them and pass them around like they do with barristers and security company etc. I like it. However, it is really just a bit of fun at the moment. It's total chaos and basically just an orgy of baiting. But right now, personally, I like it that way.

Others might have differing views, but right now, it's heaps of fun to not have to log on everyday and check, but know that someone else will handle the lads today, I can check in 5 days and pick up where i left off with entirely new lads in entirely different phases.

I think the total randomness of it is what appeals to me, and if i were playing a role of, say, the secretary i'd feel burdened by the need to play my part at the right time etc.

Right now, we're all the:

1. The manager
2. The accountant
3. The secretary
4. The messenger
5. The logistics dept
6. The pantry lady

at one time, and all from the one account.

As I said, its a great idea, but this one, i think it's heaps of fun as it is! Smile

Forms by Eamonn · Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 2:14 pm

specialisation compared to generalisation;

as the number of lads grow, (I am think about 5 times the size of the team) each baiter will have more lads to deal with;

I want to be the accountant, with the delayed template;
"We are processing the payment and will inform you in due time"

Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 7:42 pm

@Scammer, I did realise that we could bait lots of lads at the same time, and I liked the idea of retaining a particular role, as you specialising rather than generalising.

So we need a Corporate image. A website, and all the email addresses to match, with auto forward to a single address that we can all access. That way we can support each other where need be and exchange ideas for moving a bait forward, rather than the hit and miss way we do it now (although I have to admit its great fun especially when someone changes the direction of the bait unexpectedly).

Forms by Eamonn · Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 8:45 pm

@Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz

Corporate image: Yes
Website : No
Email address: no auto forward, everyone will get individual address
happened to get a link and testing before registering a domain

have started recruiting and got 2 positions filled

Posted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 12:37 am

Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz wrote:

I'll admit to being so stupid that I mixed Union and Express. What a silly boy! I was trying so hard to be helpful. Rolling Eyes

It just got a lot more confusing for him.

I thanked him for his excellent idea to retrieve the money from Union and resend it via Express. Naturally, that MIGHT have just been a simple error......

Posted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 7:46 am

@ Jimmy

Simple errors are the ones that occur by accident. I think we put a lot of effort into ours. Evil or Very Mad

Posted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 7:08 pm

can I join in the fun? cos at the mom I am baiting just one person but using 2 id's and I would like something more interesting

Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 2:01 am

@scammerbringiton^^^^

pm fun2scan or red for login info. Baiters, there are some new modalities on board for L1ghtn1ng.

Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 7:30 am

Wow, 4lb3rt has really cracked the Sh*ts:

Enraged lad wrote:

I am certain that at no time did I ever sound to you like a clown or gester.If so then there is no
basis whatsoever for you to assume that I am one!!

You are the one making me wonder if u are not doing total bullshit!!

I told you from the beginning that Alex's shoes were very big and I doubted if your feet would enter!! What on earth is this supposed to mean?
I am proved very right by youyr inadequacies.

You could not follow simple instruction such that you have put all of us into a heavy predicament
with the accountant general's office.

We are now faced with two options non of which is good:
1.Investigations into the payment in totality due to inconsistencies on the part of the beneficiary
2.Recall of the funds back to the treasury for a re-allocation.

I hope YOU WILL NOT MAKE ME REGRET EVER GETTING ACQUAINTED WITH YOU.

No guarantees matey Wink

Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 7:12 am

Notice

If you read an email from a lad and choose not to reply (ie leave it for another baiter to respond) please mark the email as "unread". This function is found under "more actions". If you open the email (or select it in the main inbox) and click "mark as unread" it will allow other baiters to see that there is a new email that hasn't been responded to.

Doing this, after reading the email, will take you back to the main inbox, so it really shouldn't be an inconvenience at all to mark it.

Thanks a lot everyone, I love the baits we have running in there, and it's great to see everyone involved.

If anyone else wants to get involved simply PM myself or fun2scam for the username and password.

Cheers

Red

Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 5:48 am

Tony wants out:

Tony wrote:

I see that we have come to the end of this mess, i can see that you are nothing but a joker who cannot do me any favor than to keep joking around.
Bye

Whoever said the "hideously ugly" comment tipped him over the edge.

Time to reel him back in. Naturally it was the son's fault, he used the computer, naughty boy. Now he's about to be chopped by Usm4n if he doesn't smarten up.

L1ghtn1ng wrote:

I received an email yesterday from a Mr. Usman Bello and he has offered me a similar deal and I must say, I am very tempted to take him up on his offer.

Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 11:51 pm

Ooooops - guilty. The hideously ugly comment was mine. But hell, it was only a suggestion........ Embarassed

Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 1:11 am

Hahahaha no, don't worry about it mate, that's the beauty of these baits, they're all pure fun. The more laughs the better.

We lost one, so what? It was fun and worth it! There's plenty more to come.

Meanwhile, G0dw1n is going apesh*t about 1TV5. He's not a happy camper. He was required to answer 69 questions. He answered 246 in 12 sessions. Naturally he has complained, so we let him know why it wasn't allowed (they accused us of dealing with a terrorist! how dare they!).

Now i've reset it to 480+ questions. If he achieves that, it'll go higher again.

Not quite a Newb Joined: 15 Jul 2007 Posts: 72

Oooh, I see 5ir 3lvi5 has taken he bait... make sure to get him good, he's a real git. BTW, he's already wise to 1TV5.

Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 1:50 am

@ red...

I think one of the great advantages of this is that we can all learn from each other... and get a good giggle as we do...

@ JJ
don't worry about killing a bait, if it happens there are many more fish in the bush... in the meantime, we can learn from each other how to go about reviving a lad with a few slaps... (like in Flying High/Airplane when everyone is lining up to slap the freeked out woman)

Cheers,
fun2scam

Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 2:19 am

lmao, 3|v15 just got the entire wikipedia entry for st3v3n mcqu33n written in the first person when he asked for a "summary of background" for our character... he seems unperturbed! Laughing

Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 7:33 am

Red wrote:

Meanwhile, G0dw1n is going apesh*t about 1TV5. He's not a happy camper. He was required to answer 69 questions. He answered 246 in 12 sessions. Naturally he has complained, so we let him know why it wasn't allowed (they accused us of dealing with a terrorist! how dare they!).

Now i've reset it to 480+ questions. If he achieves that, it'll go higher again.

I'm afraid I had to slap him a bit as he accused us of insulting him.
Hopefully we'll get an apology.

This is a great way of learning techniques, as if one person goes OTT another can step in and settle the lad down again. It amazes me just how much some of these scammer will take when they think there's a bit of cash at the end of it.

Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 7:58 am

Yeah, this one's a keeper, he's a machine. The slap was nice and called for. Make him do the work.

of course, 1TV5 are going to be pissed now because he failed so many times... Laughing

Pass the Parcel - Scambait style	View next topic View previous topic