Lad Safety

By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics and access other forums reserved for members. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today by clicking here.

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 11:33 am

I've been beating myself up over this very issue for the last five years.

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 12:41 pm

Quote:

Lets say, if we are baiting a lad and get the to travel someplace or do some stuff they meet with some mishap and they trace it to a scambait, would we get traced?
And how are we susposed to feel for them?

A lad (He n ry A h a m) has discovered this site, discovered that he has been stredded in hash conditions because of a baiter, and still carries on with his scam attempts.
How do I feel? well pi**ed off as he is not totally destroyed yet.
And he still hasn't found out who stredded him (it was Connie, the bad girl)

Hello I'm New here! Joined: 14 Dec 2006 Posts: 10

Just my two cents...and another way of saying what everyone else has said...is that by scam-baiting we just divert the energy and resources of the crook (kinda like in Aikido) AWAY from the intended target (victim).

A crook will always BE a crook. All we can do, is interceed (anonymously) on behalf of a real-life victim. We are the unseen force which buffers the innocents among us against the malevolent intentions of the crooks.

"If you live by the sword, you will die by the sword." A crook already knows this and has chosen his profession of his own free will. Just as his greed has led him down this path, so can it lead to his demise.

If good American boys can die in places like Iraq and Afganistan for defending freedom, then crooks can die an ignominious death for their chosen lifestyle.

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 1:41 pm

Lad Safety, yes lads should always wear condoms. I would hate to think they'll procreate, especially when it comes to goats.

Trophy Videos · Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 2:25 pm

This would be my near ultimate trophy, getting them on the crocs of Paga, Ghana.

They don't deserve any lad-safe baiting.

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 2:37 pm

Using scammers for croc bait? Excellent idea, but is it safe? For the crocs that is.

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 2:44 pm

^That lad either has a very high pain treshold, or he's on drugs...

There's just one word that comes to mind when looking at that: "Crikey!"

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 3:36 pm

Couldnt give a monkey's what happens to them.

Criminals are criminals, and for what they do to the victims, they really get what they deserve, I personally think they all need lining up and shooting anyway! Very Happy

(Maybe I am Evil, Laughing

)

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 9:11 pm

Inspector Gadget wrote:

A lad (He n ry A h a m) has discovered this site, discovered that he has been stredded in hash conditions because of a baiter, and still carries on with his scam attempts.
How do I feel? well pi**ed off as he is not totally destroyed yet.
And he still hasn't found out who stredded him (it was Connie, the bad girl)

What's crazy is that good old Henry is still hooked on two lines. He mentioned that he would not be ritualized but he sent Pastor G. Spot yet another series of photos today. I'll post these completely unsolicited photos later. He must be in cahoots with some other scammers that I have hooked and read the instructions from them. He's either still in love with my Connie character, or trying to trap me. Wink

So we still have a chance to totally destroy him. Laughing

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 9:14 pm

@MoP...

Quote:

EXIF Summary:

Camera-Specific Properties:

Camera Software: Adobe Photoshop 7.0

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 10:10 pm

I know.. I know.. I was just pointing out the missing expression of agony Wink

Maybe you can lend one of those open-mouthed guys Connie has produced Razz

Trophy Videos · Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 1:24 am

Bohigal did that nice chop for me for the Wulugu Safari. Very Happy

There were actually two kids in that picture. Actually, I need to find some bigger crocs. A scammer wouldn't quite fit inside one this size.

Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 1:25 am

Intentionally seeking to cause the death of a scammer would not endear any of the public to our cause. We bait scammer's to waste their time, educate potential victims, disrupt their business, cause distrust within their organisations and to humiliate these individuals.

No-one here has in the past, and I hope in the future, would deliberately cause the death of a scammer. The fallout from such a documented proof of such a crime would be paramount to effectively destroying any support we have with legitimate organisations, and the vast public. There is a much bigger picture here than a quick fix on a perceived idea of misguided justice towards a internet scammer.

Besides the legal implications, it's not easy having the death of another human being on ones' conscience, especially since there is no way you can know if that individuals crime matches the punishment. Also it's not your call.

This weeks 'ethics thread' has indeed run it's course. Time to move on. I have faith no-one who believes in our agenda would risk our work like this.

See you all next week in a new ethics thread titled, 'Fruit - The Real Victims'.