Is this vladette genuine

By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics and access other forums reserved for members. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today by clicking here.

Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 9:52 pm

I'm dipping my toe into the murky waters of love baiting, just for a bit of a laugh and I've had some pics back from this lady :

Any of you lotharios recognise her ?

Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 9:58 pm

You'll quickly learn that the pictures don't mean anything. It's places like the email headers you want to be looking at for all the juicy stuff. Pics could have come from anywhere.

Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 10:06 pm

I assumed that the picture of uncle Len and the Lidl bag with cyrillic meant she didnt lift it from the net.

these are the headers, what do they tell me (apart from the fact that ip address 80.86.140.162 appears to be in Norway) ?

Quote:

Delivered-To: [email protected]
Received: by 10.141.34.1 with SMTP id m1cs360223rvj;
Thu, 31 Jan 2008 09:55:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.78.132.2 with SMTP id f2mr3907418hud.19.1201802124671;
Thu, 31 Jan 2008 09:55:24 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mailfreedom4u.net (mailfreedom4u.net [208.72.169.176])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 23si1246660hud.3.2008.01.31.09.55.20;
Thu, 31 Jan 2008 09:55:24 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 208.72.169.176 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) client-ip=208.72.169.176;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 208.72.169.176 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) [email protected]
Received: (qmail 73251 invoked by uid 89); 1 Feb 2008 01:59:14 -0000
X-Mail-Scanner: Scanned by qSheff-II-2.1-r2 (http://www.enderunix.org/qsheff/)
Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.86.140.172?) (80.86.140.162)
by mailfreedom4u.net with SMTP; 1 Feb 2008 01:58:57 -0000
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:36:51 +0500
From: Aleksandra <[email protected]>
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.80.06) Professional
Reply-To: Aleksandra <[email protected]>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
To: "hxxxx" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re[8]: hello
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----------E0BE1EC1764FA8F"

------------E0BE1EC1764FA8F
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 10:20 pm

http://www.delphifaq.com/faq/russian_marriage_scams/f2632.shtml?p=0

http://www.stop-scammers.com/scammer.asp?id=3822

http://www.stop-scammers.com/letter.asp?id=5130

See also The Bat! and this line in the header

Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.86.140.172?) (80.86.140.162)

Usually a good sign the headers have been faked. If you see anything 10.xxx.xxx.xxx or 192.168.xxx.xxx they're usually followed by the proxy's IP address.

Have you Googled the unusual parts of the emails yet?

Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:34 am

eamonn wrote:

Is this vladette genuine . . . . . . . .

Any of you lotharios recognise her ?

I'm sure that your vladette is not genuinely trawling the internet looking for someone to love. Smile

In my experience, anyone even half as good looking as her won't need to advertise her wares.

As for recognising her, unless she is a 'personality' we'll need to find someone from her neighbourhood to confirm her identity.

I'm sure that she doesn't live in Soligorsk, or I would have recognised her. Laughing

Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 9:37 am

I know she's not really after me, what I meant was, are the photos really her. It would seem they are.
I shall continue with my long replies to her letters (mostly reviews of plays I find on google).

Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:59 am

Taken from the EXIF data

# Image Description = OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA
# Camera Make = OLYMPUS CORPORATION
# Camera Model = C5060WZ
# Picture Orientation = normal (1)
# X-Resolution = 72/1 = 72
# Y-Resolution = 72/1 = 72
# X/Y-Resolution Unit = inch (2)
# Software/Firmware Version = v756-83
# Last Modified Date/Time = 2007:02:04 18:49:41

So all we can say so far is that the photo was taken on Feb 4th last year. It could be her, or it could be stolen. Right now there's no way to tell. If I had to hazard a guess, I'd say they're stolen until you can get one taken "especially for you"

Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 1:30 pm

At first glance at the outfit I thought it was Freddie Mercury in Queen's 1975/6 tour...

Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 1:36 pm

I had female referee in mind when I saw it

Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 1:54 pm

I can see why you might have her in mind Wink

Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 2:52 pm

There are a good handfull of russian 'photobucket' type sites the scammers raid, as well as blogs of girls who are attempting to be models, or part timers, or just like posting pictures of themselves on the net.

SO...you do sometimes see nicer pics of nicer looking ladies, that don't quite look like they've been stolen from playboy, being used by scammers.

I'm not sure if I were a pretty girl I'd post hundreds of pics of myself on the web.

But....I'm a guy, and knows what teenage boys and older perves do with those pics...