Using a Lad tactic on Lads

By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics and access other forums reserved for members. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today by clicking here.

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 5:57 pm

Anyone ever thought of running a mass reverse recovery deal on Lads.

I bet many Lads have had victims who never paid up or baiters who they thought would pay out, so why not run their deal back on them as a firm of specialists offering to take up their cases, offering a 'no win, no fee' deal.

You start off asking for details, then documents, then completed forms and legal documents. Where it goes after that is up to you, but using their own tactics on them would be satisfying.

I'll try a mass mailing and see what response I get.

Trophy Videos · Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 6:20 pm

Gomer, that does sound like fun. Please let us know if you get any takers.

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 6:29 pm

A reverse hit man approach would also be nice.

Mass mailing the mugus telling them that is they don't pay up, they would be
reported to the FBI. Maybe just ask for a hand written letter
from the mugu stating that they are not criminals. Ear and hand prints
required as proof.

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 6:32 pm

That sounds like a fun idea Gomer. Can't hurt to test it out.

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 6:39 pm

A name like Crosby, Stills, Nash and Young should do the job. Very Happy

Baiting Guru Joined: 03 May 2007 Posts: 18313

Gomer, that sounds excellent. It seems that we could get them to publish their own baits this way. Wink

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 7:02 pm

If it takes off and you get a lot of biters, any chance you could refer some to a certain legal expert?
Liking the idea anyways.

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 7:13 pm

I've found a good source of legal documents (that I can doctor so that they would not be reusable) including one for providing fingerprints, also some nice medical ones. I think it would be useful to get them to sign a document to allow their body parts to be made available for transplantation. If that's the law, then they have no option. Very Happy

LONGLINKY

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 7:26 pm

GomerPyle wrote:

If that's the law, then they have no option. Very Happy

Yes we all know how near and dear the lads hold the law. Laughing

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 8:00 pm

@Mr Wang - no problem.

I have sent it out to 50 Lads to begin with and will see what response I get. I can undertake a much bigger mailing, but I just want to test the waters. If it takes a massive mailing to get a few replies then that's what I'll do.

Now I'll look at the forms and see which ones I can doctor suitably to keep THEM busy and US amused. Very Happy

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 8:11 pm

If you get too many responses you could always post them in the surplus forum, I suspect there are no end of Legal Eagles here willing to take up the Lad's cases.

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 10:04 pm

The Law Firm of Dewy, Chetum and Howe is accepting new clients if needed.

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 10:52 pm

Ohhh great. My first client speaks in Laddish - now I know how a public defendant feels. Laughing

Dr patrick Asor

Quote:

Great man thank for your care ok. guy dog no dey shop dog, na we we, i hey u ,bcoz u too much , i bi chairman 4 here, i dey spain

and later

Quote:

niaja wen na won stop, na dey every where, waiti self make una how this work rest, d work don too pay

He thanks me (which is nice) and tells me he's a guy dog (not a bitch then) which must mean, I presume he's a scammer, an Oga working in Spain and he's amused/impressed by my e-mail.

I think he wants to know how this works and pays, but even for a Lad it's pretty incomprehensible.

If I can get him to agree I'll get him to fill in the case details in his own words, I'm sure the judge will be impressed. Shocked

Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 2:27 pm

I'll have some fun with the one who wants to do business in Ladspeak AND I have another interested party Very Happy

Mrs. Teoh Zabedah

Quote:

What do i need to do

That's the attitude I want to hear. If I get any more serious enquiries I'll gladly pass them on. I won't do any more mass mailings in case things are just slow because it's the weekend. I don't want to end up deluging myself with a caseload I can't manage. Very Happy

Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 3:23 pm

Fantastic idea Gomer!

I wonder how many baiters here will see claims against them... Laughing

Trophy Videos · Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 3:24 pm

@Gomer - Gomer as Barrister Crosby. Very Happy

You do kinda look like him with that big 'ol stache of yours. Your lads will no doubt receive most excellent representation. You have fine attention to details. Very Happy

Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 10:08 am

Dr Patrick Asor followed up to clarfy things a little Shocked

Quote:

WHICH LEVEL, NA WE WE , DOG NO DEY SHOP DOG, NAIJA I HEY, NA DEY EVERY WHERE,

I think when he asks "which level" that's the giveaway that he thinks I'm a Lad working a new angle.

Obviously he smells money - and as I never like to disappoint a Lad, that's what I'll do, and it's always nice to see if I can get a Lad interested in screwing other scammers.

I mean, he could be a great source of leads and even act as my on the spot salesman. You never know, I may even get details of some victims that can be warned.

GAME ON. Very Happy

Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 11:59 am

@ Gomer

Mind if I hop aboard and tout a few thousand? I'll work out a script and clear it with you.

EDIT I thought maybe Dun, Bradstreet, Rumpole and Darrow. They could be the real saviours of the lads finances. A hint that they may be receiving mail from impostors, perhaps?

Are you sending them a real service agreement to sign?

Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:48 pm

You can borrow mine if you like Afferbecklauder, and I have no objection at all if you use the same tactic - the more the merrier.

Most Lads do bizarrely believe they have a right to their scam funds - and this plays on that mindset. I have worded it in legalese but making it appear that they will get money from all the victims/baiters who let them down.

I have made it 'no win - no fee' and concentrated on stating that I will enforce their legally binding contracts (in a roundabout way) so that they could not claim they were being scammed.

This is my wording

Quote:

Subject: Have you failed to receive money you are entitled to ?

Dear Sir

We are a firm of recovery agents who deal with cases where someone has entered into a deal with you and they have not honoured their legal obligation to pay you funds to which you are legally entitled. We believe that you have been the victim of such a situation.

We operate on a 'no win - no fee' basis, so you have nothing to lose if you have been the innocent victim. If you are successful we will recover our commission and costs from the accused and you will receive reimbursement in full.

In the USA and the UK, also the whole of Europe, it is against statute law for your money to be witheld from you in respect of legally valid contracts. Not many people know this, and that there is a simple legal remedy open to victims to recoup money stolen from you in this way.

DO NOT ALLOW YOURSELF TO BE SWINDLED AND DUPED - if you allow us to act on your behalf in the recovery of your lost money we can help you ensure that justice will be done.

Please note that the Statute of Limitations applies and we cannot recover money from deals entered into more than six years ago, otherwise we can turn your failed deals into cash in your pocket.

If you have no interest in recovering your money then just please ignore this mail. We are too busy to deal with people who are not prepared to take the sensible action open to you.

All we need is details of the deal and copies of the e-mails exchanged between you and the person you want to pay up to you.

REMEMBER - you pay us NOTHING for this service.

Regards - Reginald Queas|ey MRA
Senior Partner
Queas|ey, Wig|ey & Mo|e
Recovery Agents

Any Lads that want to play with me as their Oga will have to join the Gomer gang, of course. Very Happy

Using a Lad tactic on Lads	View next topic View previous topic