I'm in a heap of trouble here (UPDATED)

By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics and access other forums reserved for members. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today by clicking here.

Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2007 8:10 pm

Well I won't be getting that trophy call! Mad

Quote:

Please worry, we have already advice the FBI and they don't need to call you. They are very brianliant and intelident. They will get you soon. You think you can just go away with our money just like that?

If you like not to spend the rest of your life in jail send the money, but if you feel jail is the best place for you go ahead and use the money to your self. I will never beg you again because I tried to trust you and I gave you a job opportunity to enable you earn good money and you want to pay us back with stealling?

The FBI and Interpol are around you if you don't you I want to let you know now.

Mr P4ul R0gers

EDITED TO ADD: I am *still* the only check baiter here who has NOT heard from one of the FBI's many Yahoo accounts!

Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2007 8:16 pm

Quote:

They are very brianliant and intelident.

America sleeps well tonight knowing the FBI are all of the above

Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2007 8:34 pm

Do what someone else did, I can't remember who, but they used the *Bank wouldn't clear the cheque for 10 weeks, so I invested the money waiting, made $xx amount of $'s, then the cheque was disallowed, and I had enough to pay the bank and make a profit*

And I'm keeping it

Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2007 8:49 pm

^^^^ I don't think he'll go for it. 90% of the baits I've done this year have been check baits, and my experience is telling me that he's thru with me.

Oh well, plenty more where he came from.....I'll be introducing myself to some new lads soon. Twisted Evil

Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2007 9:50 pm

Ophelia Dikki wrote:

Hmm... I thought that you would not beleive them until they sent a photo of themselves with security cucumbers and the like holding a sign that says "We are the FBI". Laughing

*That* would be truly priceless Laughing

Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2007 9:56 pm

Quote:

They are very brianliant and intelident.

BK, you have such a wonderful signature line yourself if you ever want to donate the above please put me to the top of the list.

Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2007 11:54 pm

@irish: yes, making a big profit off the lad's check has been a great modality, and it infuriates them. Of course, the story is that the lad's "customer" is the scammer, not the lad. The lad has to deal with the cheatin' customer, and you keep the profits, since you don't think very much of customers who cheat. You can keep it up by promising them a small percentage of your "profits" too. One lad sent me a bank account to kill. You just have to remember whom you've run it on, as you have to start with, "Oh, there's a delay...the bank won't give me the money, but it will let me invest it. Don't worry, we're doing great..." If the lad's been burned before by the same tactic (oh, I don't know, maybe from a different baiting character or something), then he twigs immediately, so it's a once per lad kind of modality.

Master Baiter Joined: 20 Jul 2007 Posts: 100

LOL Excellent modality. Very clever. How much was the cheque for? Very Happy

Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2007 3:52 am

^^The last time, the check was for $40,000 or so. Actually, I never saw it, I just admitted I got it. I "made" $30,000 profit on it. I had sent him $2500 or so by 1tv5, so I told him he could keep that much. He tried 1tv5 on 30 consecutive days, then told me to go to hell. I apologized and offered to send it by bank wire. He sent me his bank info, which I sent on to Alan for killing. He's still bitching about it and claims he never got the bank wire. I've asked him for a repeat of the bank info, and maybe he'll give me another account to send on to Alan. The idea that he was trying to scam me, but I made the profit, must really hurt. Just don't try this on anybody named Th0ma5 L00ne.

Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 2:43 am

This seems to be an appropriate place to post this.

Delivered-To: [email protected]
Received: by 10.142.105.6 with SMTP id d6cs109654wfc;
Thu, 6 Dec 2007 13:27:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.141.132.8 with SMTP id j8mr2262552rvn.1196976432778;
Thu, 06 Dec 2007 13:27:12 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from bay0-omc2-s41.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc2-s41.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.246.177])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b8si173407rvf.2007.12.06.13.27.09;
Thu, 06 Dec 2007 13:27:12 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of
[email protected] designates 65.54.246.177 as permitted sender) client-ip=65.54.246.177;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of [email protected] designates 65.54.246.177 as permitted sender) [email protected]
Received: from BAY142-W32 ([65.55.153.67]) by bay0-omc2-s41.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);
Thu, 6 Dec 2007 13:20:00 -0800
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Return-Path: [email protected]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="_7ccb5eff-c2c5-47cf-b809-17e4510fd010_"
X-Originating-IP: [83.138.172.72]
From: Customer Service <[email protected]>
Subject: PAYMENT UPDATE NEEDED ASAP
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 21:20:00 +0000
Importance: Normal
MIME-Version: 1.0
Bcc:
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Dec 2007 21:20:00.0327 (UTC) FILETIME=[C2492570:01C8384D]

Attn Rep,
This is to inform you that the company would like to know the status of the=
payment which you received from our client...Kindly get back to me asap
=20
In God We Trust
Bruce Wales

I mean, what's his problem? The cheque was only for $78,000.

BTW, since I automated my baiter account, I seem to be getting bigger cheques. The K7 voicemail gets a regular workout.

After reading the above posts more closely, I think I will change my auto responder and signature features to incorporate the "investment" modality, then sit back and see what happens.

BTW, Barry, are you using Pyrosoft's Mail Scanner to harvest addresses?? It's really the top product available.

Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 3:06 am

^^I'd love to see the investment modality automated, as long as you understand the risk of an early twig if his funds have been "invested" before, by me maybe. My latest lad has sent me two bank accounts so far, and I think they have both been killed by Alan. I haven't heard from him for a while, so he could be ready for somebody else.

Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 11:51 am

@MikeHawk

I got the idea of patience with cheque lads from Barry Kelly originally, or it might have been Herb Sewell. The idea was to send out your bulk ASEM's and just wait, the cheques will eventually turn up,
I had reservations about the notion, but I tried it, and it works well in delayed motion and saves a lot of answering emails from lads.
All I did was put my resume into the responder, as this is the main question they ask aside from the fate of their cheque.
In my signature, I explained how bad the cell phone (K7) worked in Redwood Park National Forest, but it would accept voice messages.
I deliberately didn't answer any emails, and I was surprised to receive about .25M in cheques.
So what I will do is send out the #400 monthly mail out, leave the resume responder in place for 10 days, then change it to the investment modality until the next mail out.
Sure, you will miss a few, but enough will still send cheques to keep you satisfied.
RL has prevented me getting too involved, so all my baits revolve around automated mass mail of ASEM's.
I don't worry too much about bank accounts any more as my experience with Lotto Lads showed the same accounts kept popping up. I think the assault with the Lotto Lads wised them up.
I'll keep you posted on progress.

Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 2:47 pm

@MH: Great idea making additional profit off the lad's "seed money"!!

I have just the Check lad to break this wonderful news to! Very Happy

Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 4:49 pm

@Afferbecklauder: Your process seems perfect to me. I was exchanging an email every day with each check lad until Herb Sewell advised me to slow down. Now I ignore 90% of their emails, and it works just fine, so I agree that your minimal and automatic response is by far the best. So my schedule (still manual, alas) is 1. ASEM, 2. Reply with CV, 3. Ignore for 2 weeks, 4. Acknowledge receipt of check but say my assistant made the deposit and didn't ask when the check will clear, 5. Ignore completely for 2 weeks, 6. Make weak apology in response to their daily rants ("out of town", "sick") and promise to make "diligent inquiries" (they love the word "diligent" and frequently start repeating it back to me), 7. Ignore completely for 2 weeks, 8. Say there was some problem at the bank and I can't withdraw funds, although they let me invest the money, 9. Ignore completely for 2 weeks, 10. Say the bank has been burned before and so is holding the funds for further research, 11. Ignore 2 weeks, 12. Deliver the bad news that the check was bad but I made a bundle so thank you very much, screw you, and don't email me again.

Recently they've been demanding that I call their customer to make sure he pays, and then to call to make sure that they did pay, then call to make sure that they release the funds at their bank, then call to acknowledge receipt of funds, then call to say I've sent the money by WU. I ignore all that, and they still send the check.

The idea of automating all that, or even a part of it, is brilliant, and I wish I could do it too. The best I have is a bunch of scripts for each stage that I copy and paste (almost as well as a lad, I hope).

Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 9:18 pm

Seems to me that an auto baiter program would work well for the check lads? Too bad I don't have the programing ability to write one....

Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 10:37 pm

@ MikeHawk And The Man

My steps are 1) Mailing List - Repository. I use several different search parameters. eg, Jobs, Sales Rep, Finance manager,ets and use Pyrosofy's 419 scanner. I copy all to Excel sheet with a space between each category. Then I copy all and rerun through the scanner.
This elimates duplicates.
The script I use for ASEM is

Quote:

Mr Giovani Salvatore

My Dear Mr Salvatore

Thank you for your lovely email. It makes me so proud.
I am extremely grateful that you employed me as a part time worker. Since I have started working for you part time, I have been making over a $1000 per week.
This indicated that I have the ability and environmental needs to perform your position to your satisfaction. I am so glad you are happy with my services.
I am so pleased doing your job that I have applied for a couple of others, as I still have some spare time on my hands.
Once again,Mr Giovanni. I thank you for everything. Is it OK if anyone I have applied to emails you for a reference as to my ability? Mr Guiseppe Meyer has agreed to use him as a reference.

Thanks again

Kind regards

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Giovani is of course one of my characters, So is Mr Meyer

The auto response sends my resume to all emails received

Name Penelope Winthrop
Address Apt. #166
2575 Campus Drive
Klamath Falls, OREGON
97601
Age 33
Marital Status Single
Occupation Botanist
Telephone +1-206-339-7049

I am employed by the Forestry Department of California. I am the Botanist in charge of the Redwood National Park. My job is to ensure the health of the trees in the forest.
I am experienced in bookkeeping and banking. I have to record the takings from Park fees, and bank them regularly

The signature Feature explains the problem with Cell Phoned in the Forest. This appears on the emai;.

In future I will change the responer after 10 days and user an investment script that appears mildly crredible.
The longer the K7 message lasts the more it costs them.

I rarely answer an email

I'm in a heap of trouble here (UPDATED)	View next topic View previous topic